Archive for January, 2009

OFA Taking Shape

Posted on January 30th, 2009 in Economic Stimulus, Organizing | 3 Comments »

I’ve been wondering if Organizing for America was going to do something like this. OFA is asking supporters to organize house parties next week to discuss the economic stimulus. You can go to the Obama campaign’s website to sign up for a house party in your area or organize your own (and don’t forget to check out the cool map that lets you know how many jobs the stimulus is intended to save/create). The campaign website appears to be on the verge of becoming Organizing for America’s website, which would make a lot of sense.

In other OFA news, the other day I was talking with someone who has some knowledge of how OFA is taking shape thus far.  I was told that there will be a very small staff directing things out of Washington DC. We know that Mitch Stewart will be leading the organization as ED and Jeremy Bird will be deputy. But there will also be a data director and several other senior staffers at the DNC in Washington. Then, there will be 5 regional offices throughout the country. The vast majority of staffers in OFA will be organizers within the states that OFA focuses on and they will work directly with volunteers. I’ve heard that the hiring of these local organizers will take place over the next few months and there will be several hundred organizers hired. Now, what exactly the organizers will do with volunteers is not yet clear to me. We know what the goals of OFA are–helping to pass the President’s agenda, organizing for local elections, communicating with the White House from the grassroots. But just how organizers will work with volunteers to accomplish these goals, particularly the first, is something I assume Mitch Stewart and Jeremy Bird are still working on. I’m also very curious about what role, if any, David Plouffe will have in OFA.

Back

Posted on January 30th, 2009 in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

I’ve missed you. After an ordeal with a very strange medical problem (my salivary gland became blocked and swelled up, making me pretty sick) I’m back to blogging. And since President Obama has had such an action-packed week with Congressional Republicans (and Rush Limbaugh), it’s hard to know where to begin! One thing you quickly learn about this blogging stuff is that you cannot take a day off without feeling like you’ve missed a week.

Secrets of the Purple Tunnel Revealed

Posted on January 29th, 2009 in Inauguration, Trainwrecks | 1 Comment »

Through some anonymous contacts I have in Congress and in the Obama administration, I have new information on the miscalculation that caused ticket-holders to get stuck in the 3rd St. tunnel or “Purple Tunnel of Doom,” thus missing the swearing-in. Today Sergent-at-Arms Gainer posted a message on Facebook apologizing for previously dismissing the ordeal as caused by the “bulky or puffy” coats that people wore to the event. What he didn’t tell people is that the “puffy” coats were actually a serious miscalculation in a pre-inaugural analysis.

Tonight I’ve gained a top-secret formula that the PIC used to estimate the number of puffy coats that could fit onto the Mall:

(VBF…s)(MC) + P(SCS”LoM” | SCGBAR)(EA) - 5,000AABWG + OTPR = PCQ

(1) PCQ = Puffy Coat Quotient

(2) VBF…s = Volunteers Bailed Factor…sorry

(3) P (SCS”LoM” | SCGBAR) = Probability (Stuck Crowd Sings “Lean on Me” versus Probability Stuck Crowd Goes Ballistic And Riots)

(4) AABWG = All the Answers But Wrong Guy

(5) MC = Mall Capacity

(6) OTPR = Outdoor Toilet to Person Ratio

Now, it turns out that the magnitude of AABWGs was underestimated by several times. This error combined with a very high VBF…s and way too many toilets to human beings on the mall seems to have been the primary reason for the incorrect PCQ and thus the Purple Tunnel of Doom.

The Next “Techno-savvy” Campaign?

Posted on January 28th, 2009 in Technology, Virginia | 1 Comment »

One of my best moments of the 2008 election was when I learned that Obama had won Virginia. If you are a liberal who had the misfortune of living under the rule of Governor George Allen and then Governor Jim Gilmore back in the 90s, you know what I mean.  With the Democrats having basically taken over the state in recent years–Gov. Tim Kaine, Sen. Jim Webb, and now Sen. Mark Warner–Barack Obama winning Virginia means it is now one of the hottest battlegrounds in the nation, and is likely to remain so for quite a long time.

So back in my home state of Virginia, there’s a governor’s race that’s starting to heat up. I’ve been following the race, and it looks like it’s going to be a lot of fun. How could it not be with Terry McAuliffe running? But even more than that, it looks like the Republican candidate is going to be worth watching as well for his “techno-savvy”:

The commonwealth’s current attorney general is promising that unlike
other recent Republican campaigns, his will aggressively target younger voters using new technology. On Monday, the same day Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe used text messaging to announce his first TV spot, McDonnell posted a promise on the popular conservative blog RedState that Republicans, not Democrats, will be the tech-wizards of the 2009 governor’s race.

“If I know one thing, I know that people are interacting with media
in a way that we have never before seen,” McDonnell wrote. “I recognize this and I believe that people will see us as the techno-savvy campaign this year. We understand younger voting demographics, we understand new media technologies, and we understand the remarkable power of successfully reaching voters with our common sense, conservative message.”

Um, psst, AG McDonnell: if you want to win over younger voters, you might want to avoid using the term “techno-savvy” to sell yourself as someone who understands new technology and new media.

This guy is apparently one of the many Republicans who think that their technology deficits compared to the Democrats is their primary problem getting through to young people. Sorry, friends. It’s your candidates, your ideas, and your record that is the main problem.

Very Cool Image of the Inaugural Address

Posted on January 26th, 2009 in Inauguration | 1 Comment »

I would highly recommend going to David Bergman’s website to see his 1,474 megapixel, gigapan panoramic shot of the inaugural address. If you click on full screen and mess around it’s a lot easier to find people. It’s also worth checking out GigaPan’s page.

Pictures from Inauguration Week

Posted on January 25th, 2009 in Inauguration | 3 Comments »

After spending hours trying to figure out how to connect Flickr more directly to my blog, I finally gave up and decided to just post a link to the Flickr page with my inauguration pics. Here it is:

www.flickr.com/photos/bottomupchange/show/

A Travesty and a Miracle

Posted on January 25th, 2009 in Inauguration | 11 Comments »

I’ve been meaning to write about the “Purple Tunnel of Doom” and the severe problems that ticket-holders had getting to the purple, blue and silver sections of the inaugural viewing areas. I wish I could just focus on all that was positive about the inaugural festivities, but the fact is that there was some extremely poor planning that could have easily wrecked the whole inauguration.

As you’ve probably read about by now, there was extreme congestion and confusion for many people who had purple tickets. Several thousand people were incorrectly led to a tunnel beginning at 2nd and D St NW and ended up being stuck there for 5-plus hours in the freezing cold, missing the swearing-in. You should check out this Google Map created by someone from the Facebook group, “Survivors of the Purple Tunnel of Doom.”

What many people don’t realize about this travesty and near-disaster is that most of President Obama’s campaign staff were given purple tickets. As a result, many, many of Barack Obama’s most ardent supporters missed his swearing-in. It is just sad to read stories like this. Although it’s good to see that Sen. Feinstein is launching an investigation, her idea for paying back the ticket-holders with souvenir packets is ludicrous.

I was an extremely lucky purple ticket-holder. After some initial problems, I was ultimately able to get into the purple gate and find a very good spot to watch the swearing-in. But it was mere chance that I got in, especially considering my late arrival. Many people who exercised extreme caution in arriving at 6am or earlier and who followed the Presidential Inaugural Commitee’s (PIC) scarce instructions were denied entry by police and overwhelming crowds.

My story sheds some light on how some purple ticket-holders were able to just barely get in. I went to the swearing-in with a friend and we arrived at the Judiciary Square metro station at around 8am. The gates were supposed to open at 9am and there were already extremely large crowds on 4th St. outside of Judiciary Square and on the streets surrounding the National Mall.

Immediately after walking out of the metro station, we noticed that there was no one giving directions. Further, there were very few police in sight, no inaugural volunteers, no signs except for one which we found after initially going in the wrong direction. The sign simply stated “National Mall Ahead” with an arrow pointing in the direction we were supposed to follow. After following this sign for several blocks, we suddenly found ourselves in an enormous crowd at around 8:30am, packed in tightly with probably a thousand or more people. We were unable to move. A woman sat on a curb crying and appeared to be hyperventilating. People were shouting for a doctor or an ambulance. Eventually, some medics arrived to help.

We moved inch by inch for about an hour until we came to a complete stop at the intersection of 4th and D St. It was impossible to move and some people were trying in vain to shove their way through the crowd. The purple gate was nowhere in sight. Most people were in good spirits but we all recognized that we might end up missing the swearing-in. It was 9:30am, and I suspected that we arrived too late, that the majority of ticket-holders were already in the gate, and that a lot of the people surrounding me didn’t have tickets but were clogging up the area hoping to get as close as possible. The worst part was that no one knew what was going on or why we were stuck. There were no police in sight that should have been directing people with a megaphone. People had different explanations based on rumors they’d heard from others. The only directions given by the PIC were to take the metro to Judiciary and enter through the Purple Gate at 1st and Constitution.

It was around 9:45am when suddenly a one-way bottleneck emerged that allowed people to walk through the crowd and toward Louisiana. Having done some scouting of the area the day before, I knew that Louisiana hooked up with Constitution and First St., which was where the gate was. My friend and I were able to get through the congestion and make it to Louisiana without much trouble.

As we walked toward the Purple Gate at around 10am, we found ourselves in another congested area, but this time, we were lucky that the gate was in sight. After about half an hour, we were finally able to pass through security at 10:30am and find a place to watch the inauguration. Several staffers I knew from Wisconsin weren’t so lucky.

So, my friend and I arrive later than thousands of purple ticket-holders and manage to get in by sheer luck. I am feeling a bit of survivor’s syndrome, I must admit. But the fact that I was able to get in, and the way I got in, while thousands of people who arrived before me were left abandoned without instructions shows how twisted the process was that day.

There is a silver lining to all of this, of course: it is a miracle that no one was seriously injured or killed due to a stampede. What was the difference between the inauguration and the trampling of a Wal-Mart employee a few months ago? The only difference was probably the enthusiasm for Barack Obama becoming President at the inauguration. Considering that there were several times more people at the congested points of the inauguration than at the Wal-Mart disaster, things could have been much worse last Tuesday. A stampede would have stained the inauguration of Barack Obama much more than people not being able to witness the event.

I understand that the crowds at the inauguration were unprecedented and so it’s to be expected that there would be some glitches. 1.8 million people are reported to have filled the mall. But everyone knew this figure was likely and the lack of police, volunteers, signage, and systems was appalling. Having talked to several people who didn’t have a ticket, I am fairly confident that a large number of people around the purple, blue, and silver areas were not ticket-holders, and they were thus making the crowds worse and slowing down the process. There should have been a system in place to weed these folks out earlier, closer to the metro stations. That is only one of the small changes that could have prevented what for many people will be remembered as a day of disappointment.

I had my own, less dramatic inaugural screw-up. The organizers of the Youth Ball overticketed by several thousand and I wasn’t able to get in. But that disappointment which cost me $75 pales in comparison to not being able to see history, especially for staffers. The PIC and the White House owe those who were denied entry to the inauguration something better than a souvenir packet.

I suppose the larger lesson I take from witnessing such a debacle is that the best of intentions don’t mean much if they aren’t competently executed. Despite all the hope, optimism, and happiness many of us on the mall felt on January 20, the people who were shut out learned a bitter lesson that President Obama should heed. The American people have enormous hopes at this moment. Good intentions require excellent follow-through.

UPDATE: The Senate Sergeant-at-Arms, Terrance Gainer, now says that the fiasco at the 3rd St. tunnel was “a major security breach“.

More on Organizing for America

Posted on January 23rd, 2009 in Organizing | No Comments »

So last time I posted about Organizing for America, all the new information that was given to us was the name of the organization. A bit more info has been released today, with the introduction of the Executive Director, Mitch Stewart. No website yet, apparently, so still not a ton of news. You may have received an email with the video, but here it is anyway:

President Obama Thanks His Staff (Video)

Posted on January 23rd, 2009 in Inauguration, Organizing | 2 Comments »

I wrote the other day about the Staff Ball on January 21 at which President Obama thanked the campaign staff that helped him win the White House. I want to write a bit more and post some video I took because it was really an extraordinary moment to see the President express his gratitude to the campaign staff. And it was also a perfect gift to the staff, as was the entire ball, which was without a doubt the best party I’ve ever attended.

I was only part of the campaign’s staff for the general election, so I can only imagine what this moment must have felt like for the people who had worked full time for Barack Obama from the very beginning. Having spent three months working non-stop (7 days a week, 12 hours a day at least) without a day off, I got a taste of the incredible amount of hard work that went into this campaign. For instance, I believe my field director only took 7 days off in 18 months. The folks who spent almost two years on this campaign put a large part of their lives on hold and many made significant sacrifices to help elect Barack Obama President. So the President’s thanks was much appreciated. We truly were “The happiest people that just lost their jobs,” as Win Butler of Arcade Fire put it.

I used my digital camera to record this speech so I apologize for the shaky image. Also, I only have a few minutes of a 15 minute long speech. But, hey, something is better than nothing, right? And notice the President’s shout-out to this blog at the end of his speech ;-)

Day 2: Changing Detainee Treatment

Posted on January 22nd, 2009 in Executive Orders, Foreign Policy | 1 Comment »

Today President Obama wasted no time in tearing down the detainee policy of George W. Bush in order to make room for new procedures.  You can read summaries of the orders, but if you’re really ambitious and have some free time, you can also read the full texts of the orders at the White House website, here.